Recently in European Union Category

JIM Fitzpatrick's comments on the next round of CAP reforms reinforce the impression that attitudes within Defra are changing.

His carefully worded comments are intended to stress forcefully that there will be no change of policy when it comes it comes to negotiating the future of the CAP over the next couple of years.

Defra, the Treasury and Downing Street will make it clear in any talks that their long-term goal remains the removal of Single Payments and other forms of direct support for farmers across the EU.

That farmers should only be paid ultimately for delivering public goods, largely in the form of environmental benefits, will remain the mantra.

What the Farming Minister has signalled, however, is a new approach to how the UK handles these negotiations in Europe. A 'pragmatic, realistic' approach, as he put it.

The 2005 Defra-Treasury document outlining the idealistic, and many would argue entirely unrealistic, Government vision for the CAP has won the UK few friends in Brussels and across the EU.

More importantly, it is seen to have cost the UK influence. The Government has, at times, appeared to be isolated in CAP discussions as fellow member states have preferred to talk amongst themselves as they seek common solutions.

Mr Fitzpatrick has acknowledged that the UK will get further by recognising the reality of the situation -the overwhelming desire across the EU to retain some form of direct support post-2013 - than by continuing to demand the impossible.

With an election looming, the issue may be taken out of Mr Fitzpatrick and this Government's hands.

But whoever takes on the mantle of negotiating these vital reforms, the principle he ahs outlined should be taken on board.

Talking 'in the room with EU partners' is bound to result in a better deal for UK taxpayers and farmers than yelling from the sidelines. And being ignored.

Not for the first time, the French are leading the way in European discussions about the future of farming.

 

Last week, the French Agriculture Minster invited 21 'like minded' EU Member States to gather in Paris to discuss how best to dish out a CAP budget worth almost £50 billion.

 

Monsieur Bruno Le Maire said Britain was not 'like-minded' hence no invite.

 

It was an embarrassment for Defra, although the line from Whitehall was that Hilary Benn, Environment Secretary, was busy and a representative had gone in his place. 

 

Either way, invite or no invite, it is clear Defra has a mountain to climb if British interests are to be adequately fought during discussions of the CAP post-2013.    

 

The memory lives strong of deal struck in 2002 between France and Germany to protect farm spending, against the express wishes of the UK Government.

 

It happened again in 2005 when the Government was promised a shake-up of farm subsidies in return for giving up the hard-fought budget rebate, worth around £7 billion.

 

Today the promised shake-up still seems far away but this year Britain's contribution to the EU budget will rise by 60 per as the rebate slips away.

 

The danger of being outmanoeuvred once again must demand a change in the Government's tactics.

 

The route of the problem is clear - it is Defra's wholehearted and ideological desire for a fundamental reform of the CAP.

 

It wants to remove all subsidies and protection so the market can reward farmers for their outputs and it wants the CAP to provide a reward for social benefits, such as environmental goods, that the market cannot provide. 

 

To some the stance is admirable, perhaps even desirable, but it stands in direct opposition to France, and 21 other member states' who wish to protect their farmers from the market.

 

More importantly, it precludes the UK from being involved in the debate.

 

If Defra is to influence policy in Europe, it must be seated at the top table and for this it may need to soften on its ideology.

 

France does not have British farm interests at heart and it would be naïve to think that by excluding Defra from talks, our farmers will be given a better deal. They won't.

 

Defra must to be engaged in Europe. It is then the job of British Agriculture Plc. to ensure Defra represents farmers' best interest.

The days when British farmers were masters of their own destiny are long gone.

 

Today, regulation, rule and dictate comes from a far, far, far off land (well, Brussels) where decisions on animal welfare rules, pesticide use, farm payments and sheep tags are made by people whose people wear lederhosen (Germany and Austria).

 

And people whose people live in the dark for half of the year (Finland and Norway).

 

And people whose people knocked us out of the France '98 World Cup (Romania).

 

Etc.

 

In total there are 27 idiosyncratic peoples from 27 different European nations choosing how, for instance, a farmer in Cumbria will keep track of his (or her) sheep.

 

With so many different voices at the table it is important to have a strong overall leader - which is why the job of European Union Agriculture Commissioner is held in such high regard.

 

It is an influential job and strong leaders can power change.

 

Franz Fischler powered the 2003 CAP reforms, for instance.

 

Then five years ago Mariann Fischer Boel took the CAP reform batten from Mr Fischler and powered her own reform.  

 

Despite having the unenviable task of following in the great Austrian's bear-like footsteps, the Dane has shown tact and guile in forcing further reform of the CAP, cutting more subsidies from production and gradually putting farmers back in touch with the market place.

 

Overall, she has been a conscientious friend of the British farmer.

 

So her retirement from politics, announced this week, will send a shudder down some British farming spines.

 

Who will be the next leader of our eclectic gaggle of policy makers?

 

Who will drive the European ag policy juggernaut after 2013?

 

(Current betting is on the people whose people knocked us out of France '98.)

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the European Union category.

EID is the previous category.

Food Security is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.